Section 8 Ground 1A Notice Period 2026: Is 'Selling Up' Becoming the New No-Fault Eviction?

No-fault evictions are gone, but is 'selling up' the new loophole? Lucid Legal explains what agents must prove under Section 8 Ground 1A in 2026, and the compliance risks of getting it wrong.

Is 'selling up' becoming the new no-fault eviction?

It's a scenario we see often: a tenant raises repairs issues or asserts their rights, relations sour, and shortly afterwards the landlord announces they're selling the property and the tenant needs to leave. The tenant is left wondering whether the sale is genuine, or whether it's a convenient way to achieve what a Section 21 notice used to do without the paperwork now required to prove fault.

Since the Renters' Rights Act abolished Section 21 'no-fault' evictions and moved all tenancies onto rolling periodic assured tenancies, landlords who want their property back must use one of the specific grounds under Section 8, and Ground 1A, which covers a genuine intention to sell, has understandably drawn attention. Some tenants are asking whether it's being used as a workaround. The honest answer is: it can be genuine, but it can also be misused, and the difference matters enormously for landlords and the agents acting for them.

What does Ground 1A actually require landlords to prove?

Ground 1A is a mandatory ground, meaning a court must grant possession if the landlord meets the conditions, but those conditions are not trivial. The landlord must genuinely intend to sell the property, and must be able to evidence that intention if challenged, for example through instructions to an estate agent or solicitor.

Notice periods matter too. Landlords relying on this ground generally need to give several months' notice, commonly discussed as around four months, and the ground typically cannot be used within the early protected period of a new tenancy, designed to stop landlords granting a tenancy and almost immediately trying to end it. Agents should always check the current statutory notice period and protected period at the time of serving notice, as transitional provisions and secondary legislation can adjust the detail.

Crucially, if a landlord serves a Ground 1A notice, regains possession, and then doesn't actually sell, or re-lets the property within a restricted period, this can expose them to a rent repayment order, financial penalties, and reputational damage, and can undermine any defence the agent gave in advising the eviction was lawful.

Why misusing 'selling up' is a serious risk for agents, not just landlords

Agents are often the ones drafting and serving notices, and increasingly the ones fielding tenant complaints when a 'sale' doesn't materialise. If an agent knowingly (or carelessly) helps a landlord use Ground 1A as a disguised route to remove a tenant they simply want gone, that agent risks action from their redress scheme, complaints to Trading Standards under consumer protection and material information rules, and in serious cases exposure alongside the landlord for unlawful eviction.

This sits alongside the agent's other core compliance duties that don't disappear just because a tenancy is ending: deposit protection compliance must still be evidenced, client money protection cover must be current, and Right to Rent checks and redress-scheme membership must be in place and demonstrable. A landlord under pressure to remove a difficult tenant quickly can easily push an agent towards cutting corners on all of these, which is exactly when regulators and courts take the closest look.

What agents should do to keep landlords, and themselves, on the right side of the law

Before serving any Ground 1A notice, agents should insist on genuine evidence of an intention to sell, marketing instructions, a signed agency agreement, or a solicitor's confirmation, and keep it on file. This protects the landlord if the tenant later disputes the notice, and protects the agent if the landlord's true motive turns out to be less straightforward.

Where a landlord's history includes disputes over repairs or previous attempts to end the tenancy, agents should be especially careful to document the chronology and the genuine commercial reason for the sale. A clean paper trail is the best defence against an unlawful eviction claim, a rent repayment order application, or a redress-scheme complaint, and it's far cheaper than defending one after the fact.

Ground 1A can lawfully end a tenancy when a landlord genuinely intends to sell, but agents must insist on real evidence of that intention and get notice periods right, because a disguised 'selling up' eviction can leave both landlord and agent facing rent repayment orders, redress-scheme sanctions and unlawful eviction claims.

Need advice on how these changes affect your portfolio or agency?

Lucid Legal · SRA Regulated · No. 8011100 · This article is general commentary and not legal advice.